The Bog of Lost Scholars

30 January 2007

Jane, Jane, Jane

Filed under: Film and Media — Castiron @ 01:40

It was sheer luck that I happened to catch the recent version of Jane Eyre on Masterpiece Theatre; we’d happened to have PBS on earlier, and when I saw the announcement, I decided to see if it was any good.

Things I liked:

  • Jane.
  • Rochester.
  • Young Jane. (I thought she looked familiar….)
  • The way the movie showed how utterly creepy Jane and Rochester’s relationship really is.
  • And the way it showed how it’s nonetheless an improvement over Jane’s past life.
  • Bertha Rochester. Very different from how I visualized her madness, but it worked. Perhaps sometime I’ll gird my loins and go read Wide Sargasso Sea.
  • Jane’s return to Thornfield.
  • St. John, and how he’s even more creepy than Rochester.

Things that annoyed me:

  • The condensation of Jane’s early life. Ten chapters in fifteen minutes. Anyone who hadn’t read the book (like my boyfriend) would be going “what the heck’s going on here, and who cares about this Helen person?” Of course they had to trim stuff to fit the book into a four-hour movie, but the beginning was clipped to the point of disjointedness. And Bessie made no sense later in the movie, since she’d barely been on stage earlier.
  • That stuff about twins is not in the book that I recall.
  • Okay, it’s more believable that Rochester would have hired a third party than that he would have dressed in drag and passed unrecognized, but I still wanted to see Rochester in disguise.
  • I was a bit distracted while watching, so I’m not sure whether movie-Jane actually had amnesia or was just faking it, but in either case, oh please.
  • Why the heck was St. John going to Africa rather than India? Is this British PC-ness, or what?

Overall, it had a lot of good moments. I could see myself shelling out $15 for the DVD, but not $25.

29 January 2007

Socks, Verily

Filed under: Crafts — Castiron @ 01:18

The Provence Socks are done. Generic toe-up sock with thumb joint heel, Regia yarn, #1 needles, 60 stitches. I’ve considered starting more socks but have two more already in progress, so I’ll probably try and finish at least the Bearfoot socks first.

In the meantime, my latest Knitpicks order arrived, so I’ve started a hat; depending on how much it expands in the laundry, it’s either for my son or my boyfriend. I also finally got yarn for a pair of Fiber Trends clogs for myself, though that’s another I probably won’t start until I finish something else.

The Sparkles shawl is growing, and I continue to look forward to its being done. No progress on anything else yet.

25 January 2007

On Guilt

Filed under: Random Ramblings — Castiron @ 19:19

A friend was drawing cards from the Dreaming in Color deck for folks on her friendslist. Mine was Guilt.

Guilt, to me, is frequently a less than useful emotion.

Guilt generally occurs at the wrong time. When I do something that I shouldn’t or fail to do something I should, I feel guilt — but unless I’ve repeatedly done/left undone said thing, I don’t feel it on the next occasion BEFORE I do/don’t do the action.

It’s telling, by the way, that the first example that comes to mind is eating too much sugar-laden food. Women seem especially prone to guilt over our eating choices. And it’s definitely a case of non-useful guilt — I rarely hear someone say, “After I ate two chocolates from the box, I remembered how bad I felt the last time I scarfed down a whole box, so I put the rest away for later.” It’s much more likely to be “I knew I shouldn’t, but I ate the whole thing.” Gee, the guilt isn’t doing very much good there, is it?

And why, precisely, is it bad that you ate the whole box anyway? No, I’m not saying that it’s necessarily good. But if you can’t answer the question “why is it bad?”, that’s another indicator of non-useful guilt. If I can say, “it’s bad because eating too much chocolate at once throws off my blood sugar and my digestion, and I should treat my body better than that” or “overindulging in any food is gluttony, which is a sin”, the next time I see a box of chocolate I’m a bit more likely to remember that there’s a reason why I shouldn’t eat it all, or eat any. If all I can come up with is “because it’s bad, that’s all,” that’s not going to change my behavior.

The one time after-the-fact guilt becomes useful is when there’s actually something I can do right then to make amends. For example, if I’m feeling guilty because I said something cruel to a friend, I can pick up the phone or hit the email and apologize. But if I’m feeling guilty because I ate the chocolate, there’s not much I can do other than not eat more until dinner, and I probably don’t feel like eating more anyway. And if I’m feeling guilty over something I did twenty years ago, well, it had better be something really big to justify my dwelling on it, and even so, by now I’ve either changed my ways (and the guilt’s served its purpose) or I haven’t (and there’s a wrong more recent, and more likely to be amendable, that I should be thinking about instead).

(In writing this, I’m realizing that I make a distinction between guilt, remorse, and regret. Guilt is the generic. Remorse is rational and appropriate guilt, what one feels towards a specific thing done or not done, that one can give a reason for its being wrong, and that’s felt in proportion to the wrongness of the offense. Regret is wishing one had done something differently, but doesn’t imply that the original action/inaction was inherently wrong — I regret not going to see Silly Wizard the one time I had a chance to, but missing the performance wasn’t a sin. Regret can also be remorse that’s been cleaned of the guilt burden over time; I know that the action was wrong, and I’ve learned better, but I no longer feel guilt when I think about it.)

23 January 2007

Romantic Reading

Filed under: The Castiron Reading Journal — Castiron @ 19:32

When I won the Smart Bitches’ Duncan’s Big Misunderstanding contest, in addition to a title, I received a $25 Amazon gift certificate. So it seemed only fitting that I use it to try an author who receives strong reviews on SBTB, P.C. Cast. I bought four of her books and have read two so far, Goddess of Light and Goddess of Spring.

These two books are in Cast’s mythology series — mortal women find love with Greek deities. In Goddess of Spring, Lina, a baker from Tulsa, makes a deal with Demeter to inhabit Persephone’s body and spend six months in the underworld, while Persephone inhabits her body and saves her bakery from bankruptcy; while in the underworld, Lina falls in love with Hades. Goddess of Light takes interior decorator Pamela to Las Vegas, where she meets and falls for Apollo.

I’m glad I read Light first, even though it’s later in the series, as I found Spring the better book. Both books have interesting heroines with strong personalities, entertaining secondary characters, and steamy sex scenes; both books are a lot of fun to read. But both books also use the idea of soulmates, which I’ve grown rather allergic to in my old age; I tolerated it better in Spring than in Light. Also, the resolution in Light didn’t quite work for me. It was certainly a different and unexpected way to finally get the couple together on terms that would work for Pamela, but it wasn’t satisfying for me as a reader; to me it left too many other things hanging. I wanted to know how Vee handled the events, and there’s never any hint thereof; I also wasn’t entirely clear on what the long-run results of the arrangement would be. Both books were worth reading, and Spring is staying in my keeper pile, but Light I’m not so sure about.

Loretta Chase, Lord Perfect. This is another one where I kinda wish I’d waited long enough for the review to get fuzzy in my mind before reading the book. Too many things from the SBTB review were in my head as I was reading, and I found it hard to form an independent opinion on the setup. Still, it was a fun romp, and the characters mostly acted believably. I’m not sure I’ll buy a copy, but it was worth getting from the library.

16 January 2007

Partially Illustrated Craft Update

Filed under: Crafts — Castiron @ 16:31

Some recent projects:

  • Top left: cable sweater. I haven’t done much with it in the past couple months; it’s nearly to the point where I should divide for the armholes, and I need to decide what I’m doing with them.
  • Bottom left: Mesa shawl. A row or two, but not much lately. However, now that Kiri’s done, I should start working on this again. (It’s at a point where the pattern changes every couple rows, which makes it less portable than it used to be.)
  • Middle top: Regia Provence socks. Finished the heels last night; just have to knit the cuffs until I’m happy with the length.
  • Middle bottom: crochet lace top. Largely unworked on. (At some point I will force myself to do a square a day until I finish the darn thing, but I’m not there yet.)
  • Top right: Bearfoot socks. One foot is almost to the heel; the other is not much beyond the toe.
  • Middle right: Sparkles shawl. Growing slowly. It’s a decent bus project.
  • Bottom right: Ivy socks. Haven’t worked on lately; may move up in the queue once the Regia and Bearfoot socks are done, as they’ll be good summer socks.

Unpictured: Flanders map, Ruby, pentacle, crane, Fantasy Sampler, black shirt & skirt (pretty much on hold until sewing machine’s fixed), Fair Isle swatch cap (having second thoughts about making the sweater, after wool mitts got eaten in the drawer not even six months after I made them), dance apron, Mill Hill ornament, bobbin lace doily

14 January 2007

More Bad Ancestry OCR

Filed under: Genealogy — Castiron @ 12:16

In the Ancestry.com census index: Ashak Bagell.

On the census page: Abrah. Engelbrecht.

Okay, I’ll grant that the census page is hard to read. Still, this is further strengthening my suspicion that Ancestry used a computer to OCR the census records, because a human would have at least said “hey, that first name could be Abraham”, and a human who knew Frederick MD surnames would likely have said, “Oh, Engelbrecht!”

(And why am I looking at Abraham Engelbrecht? One of my usual Frederick tangents. I was originally working through my database in an orderly fashion, and was up to Oliver Storm, my great-great-uncle. Searching for him, I got interested in his parents and grandparents. So I pulled out Engelbrecht’s Marriage Ledger to confirm a few dates, and eventually I got to Oliver’s aunt Salina…who turns out to have married Jacob Engelbrecht’s son Philip, which makes her kids, including Abraham, distant cousins of mine.)

13 January 2007

Recent Reading

Filed under: The Castiron Reading Journal — Castiron @ 21:30

Patricia C. Wrede and Carole Stevermer, The Mislaid Magician (in spite of the fact that I haven’t yet finished The Grand Tour). Delightful. No-longer-Regency fantasy. Go read it.

Rosylyn Hardy Holcomb, Rock Star. An interracial romance between a woman who owns a bookstore and a man who’s a rock musician. While I found the writing occasionally clunky or charcters being way too psychologically aware to be believable, overall it was a fun story; the characters were interesting, and the author doesn’t gloss over the real problems the couple faces. (Plus, when Callie says to Bryan that the Alabama-Auburn game is practically a religious holiday and that everyone in the state basically sides with one or the other, Holcomb revealed her high Alabama Cred. It didn’t surprise me afterwards to read the bio and find that she herself is from Alabama.)

Deborah Bergman, The Knitting Goddess. Note to people writing how-to books for new knitters: If the first thing you’ve taught is garter stitch, and you’re following that with how to fix a dropped stitch, take the extra effort to explain how you pick up a dropped stitch in garter stitch rather than in stockinette. Note 2: Almost every gauge label I’ve seen on a yarn is for stockinette stitch; your gauge in garter stitch is almost certainly going to be different in at least one dimension if not both. It’s okay to mention gauge early, but when you’re talking about gauge on a yarn label, wait until you’ve introduced stockinette.

In other words, I absolutely would not recommend this book to a brand-new knitter looking for a learn-to-knit book; it’ll leave them thoroughly confused. And while the patterns seem simple enough, they call for some pretty darn pricey yarn — an experienced knitter will know how to substitute, or if they love the called-for yarn, will have the knowhow to make something that doesn’t waste their $50-$150, but a completely new knitter could end up with an expensive tangle.

That said, the retellings of myths are quite good, so if you’re a knitter with pagan leanings or interested in mythology, it’s worth reading for the stories. And I could see making the Athena cowl (though in a different and cheaper yarn), which might justify checking the book out from the library again sometime. But I don’t plan to buy a copy.

I’m quite likely, however, to buy a copy of Loretta Chase’s Miss Wonderful. Alistair Carsington and Mirabel Oldridge clash over the building of a canal through Mirabel’s town, but fall in love nonetheless. I love the characters, and the steamy bits are quite steamy. There are a few plot bits that I didn’t care for — the villainous character is a generic ass, and I think the story could have been made novel-length and the tension raised without using him at all. Overall, though, it’s a good story.

5 January 2007

2006 Crafts in review

Filed under: Crafts — Castiron @ 22:11
  • Projects finished in 2006: 24 (19 knit, 1 cross-stitch, 3 sewing, 1 crochet)
  • UFOs when the ball dropped: 17 (6 knit, 6 cross-stitch, 2 sewing, 1 crochet, 1 needlepoint, 1 bobbin lace)
  • UFOs started in 2006: 12
  • FOs started in 2006: 21
  • Last FOs of 2006: my son’s sweater, and the Mill Hill ornament
  • Oldest UFO: Flanders Map, started in 1998
  • UFO that’s the closest to being finished if I’d just sit down with it for two afternoons: Crane needlepoint
  • First project started in 2007: boring garter-stitch scarf, two skeins of Jelli Beenz
  • Projects that I really need to finish in 2007: Mesa Shawl, dance apron, Ruby Heart ornament
  • Projects that I reasonably expect to finish in 2007: cable sweater, Provence socks, Ivy socks, boring garter-stitch scarf, Sparkles shawl, Idrija doily
  • Project that I am resolved to get rid of if I don’t finish it in 2007: Crane needlepoint
  • Projects that I’d rather like to finish in 2007 but probably won’t: Flanders map, Fantasy sampler
  • Projects that I bought yarn for in 2006 but haven’t started: 10
  • Projects that I’ve bought yarn for so far in 2007: 4
  • Projects that I’m sorely tempted to buy yarn for, though so far I’ve resisted: at least 3 (more if you count the colors of Regia I want)
  • Amount of attention I’m paying to Knit from your Stash 2007: None, clearly
  • Cross-stitch patterns bought in 2006: about 4
  • Cross-stitch patterns I already had, in leaflets and magazines, that I haven’t made: about 180
  • Amount of the rest of my life I could spend doing cross-stitch patterns I want to do, without ever buying another leaflet: 100%
  • Number of sewing projects I’m likely to finish if I don’t either fix my sewing machine or get the treadle working: 0

2007 goals:

  • Number of pre-2006 UFOs to finish: 2
  • Number of 2006 UFOs to finish: 11
  • Number of pairs of socks to knit: 6, not counting the two I’ve started
  • Number of shawls to finish: 3, including two I’ve started
  • Number of sweaters to finish: 2, including one I’ve started
  • Number of ornaments to cross-stitch: two, including one I’ve started

1 January 2007

ISBN.

Filed under: Publishing and Writing — Castiron @ 21:05

The ISBN-10 is dead. Long live the ISBN-13.

(Actually, the ISBN-10 will still be lurking along for as long as pre-2006 copies of books exist, but as far as new books go, it’s 13 all the way!)

Powered by WordPress