The Bog of Lost Scholars

24 October 2006

Craft Update: Knit, Knit, Knit

Filed under: Crafts — Castiron @ 00:01

After the previous weekend’s difficulties, this weekend the knitting went more smoothly:

  • Two pattern repeats on Kiri (which combined are still fewer stitches than the final pattern repeat will be!).
  • A few rows on Mesa, enough to get to the second pattern.
  • The sleeve cuffs on the Crayon sweater.
  • A few rows on the Sparkles shawl; I’m finally back to where I was before the equipment failure. (I love the colors and the shininess of the ladder yarn, and I’ll enjoy wearing the shawl when it’s done, but overall it’s enough of a pain that I don’t expect to do many projects with this stuff.)
  • A few rows on the Provence sock. (I’m a little tempted to work a pattern in the leg, but we’ll see.)

19 October 2006

Nettie and Florence Cronise

Filed under: Genealogy — Castiron @ 20:36

After a couple weeks of flailing randomly about the census, and a couple more weeks of trying to focus on particular families but getting distracted, I finally decided to start at the beginning of my database and work through in numerical order.

This week I got to the family of Henry and Susanna (Fundenberg) Cronise. Henry and Susanna come from Frederick, Maryland, but moved to Ohio and lived out their lives there. My great-aunt had one of their daughters as Katherine Barbara Cronise, who married Jacob Staub and had children, Annette (“Nettie”) and Florence. When I found the family on 1850, Jacob wasn’t listed, and Katherine, living with her parents, was listed as a Cronise, but Nettie and Florence Staub (and an older sister, Alice) were also in the family.

In 1860, Nettie and Florence are still there, and have the surname Cronise. Hmm, I thought. Nettie disappeared after 1870, but I found Florence on the 1910 census, living with her mother. Then I happened to look at what was listed for Florence’s occupation.

Lawyer???

A bit of websearching led me to an article on Nettie and Florence Cronise. Turns out that both of them were lawyers — in fact, Nettie was the first woman admitted to the bar in Ohio, and married another lawyer named Nelson Lutes. (Here’s a picture of Nettie Cronise Lutes.)

(I also learned why the surname change — their grandfather had adopted them. I’m still not sure whether their father died or just vanished. [ETA: Another article indicated that their father was an alcoholic, and Katherine divorced him.])

18 October 2006

On Savings

Filed under: People, Culture, and Society — Castiron @ 23:30

Several months ago, I volunteered to be the publicist for a folk dance camp. I didn’t realize at the time that this meant I’d have to pay up front for running the copies of the registration brochure, a $180 expense; I’d get reimbursed for it, but not until some weeks afterwards. I grumbled a little when I figured this out, as I’d just paid my annual auto insurance fee and my budget was a little tight, but I was able to pay for the copies and to do without the money until the reimbursement check arrived, no other expense other than what interest the $180 might have earned if it’d stayed in the bank for a month.

One of my acquaintances had a phone bill that was $25 more than usual. This threw them into complete financial crisis, scrounging and scraping and having to charge other basic needs on an already-laden credit card; in the end, that unexpected $25 bill probably cost them at least $50 in credit card interest, late payments, etc.

The more I observe myself and my friends, the more I think the real guideline for assessing someone’s financial shape is how big an unexpected expense they could pay for if given, say, three business days to come up with the money.

Needing $X right now — that’s it right there. Most Americans, if told that they would have to spend $100 on something a year from now, could save the money by then; a lot fewer could write you a check for it this afternoon. If I have until 2010 to come up with several thousand dollars to replace my roof, I could do it barring other financial or medical disasters; if I had to come up with that money by the end of the month, I’d probably have to take a loan, which would cost me more in the long run. If you have a medical emergency and need major surgery, you don’t just have to come up with $50,000; you have to come up with $50,000 now. (This is why I’m highly skeptical of medical savings accounts as a solution to the U.S. healthcare crisis; there’s no guarantee that you’ll have saved up the money to cover the expense when it happens, especially if you’re young or poor.)

What’s helped me to develop savings, besides having the good fortune to earn more than I need for immediate survival, is the attitude that money in savings doesn’t exist. It’s leftover from childhood training; as a kid, I got it in my head that money in savings accounts was Never To Be Touched Because It’s For College. Now I have it in my head that money in savings accounts or CDs is Never To Be Touched Because It’s For Major Necessary Home Repairs (like that roof replacement that I really need to do in the next couple years) Or Disaster Survival. When I’m thinking “can I afford X?”, where X is a book or a new laptop or a loom, the savings doesn’t even enter the calculation. (And even if X is a home improvement or a major car repair, I still tend not to remember my savings. My idea of being rich is to have so much saved up that I can pay cash to replace the roof and still have enough to cover basic expenses for a year.)

17 October 2006

Dear Census Transcriber….

Filed under: Genealogy — Castiron @ 08:41

Dear whatever person or software transcribed the Frederick County 1900 census for Ancestry.com:

I do actually recognize that the 1900 census is one of the biggest pains to transcribe; not only did the writer have crap handwriting, but the pages have notes over the names that make it really hard to read if you don’t already have some idea who you’re looking for. I absolutely grant that.

That said, how the heck did you get this:

Oliver M Zimmerman, 77
Helen C Zimmerman, 46
Mabelle R Zimmerman, 44
Curtis T Zimmerman, 35

from this:

Ann M. Zimmerman, 77
Luther C. Zimmerman, 46
Isabelle R. Zimmerman, 44
Curtis T. Zimmerman, 35

If Curtis’s name hadn’t been transcribed correctly, I’d never have found these folks without a slow browse.

(On the bright side, at least the surname was transcribed correctly….)

16 October 2006

Beguilement

Filed under: The Castiron Reading Journal — Castiron @ 00:26

My copy of Lois McMaster Bujold’s new book, The Sharing Knife, Book 1: Beguilement arrived yesterday, and I finished it last night.

I’ll hopefully post a more coherent thought sometime when I’m more awake. But what struck me on first read (other than ooh! cool! more! whaddya mean we have to wait till June for book 2????):

Reading Beguilement feels like reading one of Lackey’s Valdemar novels, if the Valdemar novel had grown and changed with me over the years.

(No, there are no telepathic reincarnated spirit horses in Beguilement. Or lifebonds.)

14 October 2006

Unfrogging

Filed under: Crafts — Castiron @ 17:43

I ripped out the rows in the cable sweater, and I’m now past where I was when I noticed the error. I’ve ripped back my son’s sweater, made the armhole castoffs, and now am almost done with the front. I’ve cast on the stitches for the Sparkles shawl, though I haven’t knit any further than that yet. I’m back on track.

10 October 2006

The Metadance of International Folk Dance

Filed under: Dance — Castiron @ 00:43

One of the members of the local folk dance group commented that when he was out at another dance spot, someone told him that they weren’t interested in international folk dance, because the dancers were more interested in preserving dances than in having fun.

While I disagree with this assessment — I can’t think of anyone in our group who isn’t interested in having fun — I can see how someone might get that impression.

There’s an inherent tension in recreational international folk dance between accuracy and entertainment. If you focus too closely on the precise styling and getting the dance Right, you’ll drive away everyone but a few hard-core folks. But if you relax your standards too far, you’re not doing the dance anymore. You’re doing a dance from someone else’s folk tradition, so you want to know how the dance is actually done in the village where it originates — and yet, the folk process doesn’t stop just because the dance has crossed a national border or an ocean. (Bounces in the third bar of Arap feel right, darn it, whether or not Macedonians actually do them.)

There are definitely people whose idea of fun is doing these dances as accurately as possible. They’ll research the region or even the village; they’ll find out which variations are actually attested and which are foreign additions; they’ll visit the country if possible; they’ll look at how this area’s style differs from that area’s.

Dance groups need those people. They’re the ones who keep reminding us that this isn’t just Balkan-influence aerobics; these are the cultural expressions of other people, that have actually been performed by folks on the other side of the world as part of their everyday lives. We didn’t make these dances up ourselves; we’re not from those cultures (or at least, if it’s a recreational group that doesn’t focus on a specific country, we’re from at most one or two of them).

And on the other hand — we’re not from these cultures. Men and women dance together in dances that would’ve been single-sex in the original village. The dance that’s done in a village to celebrate a marriage might be done by our group to celebrate the visit of a good accordion player, or just because someone loves the music. We think nothing of doing back-to-back dances from two cultures that are mortal enemies, or at most we joke about equal representation.

These dances are dual citizens; we’ve made them part of the International Folk Dance culture. So as we perform the dance itself, we also perform a metadance, a balancing act between the dance as it was created and the dance as we recreate it.

9 October 2006

Coming Unraveled

Filed under: Crafts — Castiron @ 15:37

This was a ripping weekend here at Castiron Craft Central. Alas, that’s not “ripping” in the British sense.

After getting several rows into the Sparkles shawl, the needle came apart in my bag, causing large numbers of stitches to fall off. Since Sparkles is a slippery yarn, a slew of stitches dropped to the beginning, and I ended up having to rip the whole thing and start over. Sigh.

I also had to rip four rows out of the cable sweater; I accidentally knit up two extra stitches in one cable, and it soon became clear that just dropping them was not sufficient to fix the problem.

So I put my son’s sweater front in my knitting bag and worked on that for a while. And I’ve just compared it with the back and discovered that I should have cast off for the armholes four inches ago.

Cross-stitch is looking very appealing lately….

8 October 2006

Qur’an Slog: Getting Help

Filed under: Religion — Castiron @ 15:37

I’m not a very good independent scholar.

Oh, I can learn practical skills on my own — many of my needlework skills are self-taught from books or websites, for example. But when it comes to a long-term course of intensive study, I have trouble blocking out the time for it; I get very few stretches of uninterrupted quiet time, and when I do, fifteen other tasks are competing for the minutes.

So classes are a big help. It’s not that I necessarily learn better from a teacher; it’s that the class provides structure. And it’s psychologically easier for me to block out two hours to go to a class than it is to block out two hours to study at home.

When my church offered a class on reading the Qur’an, then, I signed up. We’re working from the back forward, so I’ve now read the last twenty surahs. The teacher is interesting and intelligent; the students, being Unitarians, ask lots of pointed questions. I’ve learned that my earlier assessment was correct; the Qur’an does indeed make reference to stories that the audience in 7th century Arabia would have known well but that 21st century readers might not be so familiar with. The class is definitely helping me make more sense of what I’m reading.

7 October 2006

Biblical Names

Filed under: Genealogy — Castiron @ 15:36

When my sister was considering Biblical names for her first child, I gave her plenty of suggestions, like Habukkuk or Abishag. She ignored me, for some reason….

It’s interesting how some Biblical names are popular and some aren’t.

Not just because some name has bad associations — I don’t expect to see many Pontius Pilates, Judases, or Jezebels in my son’s classes! But I don’t see many Nehemiahs or Habukkuks either.

When I did a long crawl through the Frederick MD census of 1850, it struck me that I didn’t see any men named Mark. I eventually ran across two. There are more men named Simon (52). There are more men named Casper (6) — okay, it’s not Biblical, but it’s Catholic traditional. There are more men named Zephaniah (4).

Today, most Americans know at least one man named Mark. Zephaniah, not so much. It’s interesting how the fashions change.

(Habukkuk, however, was as unpopular in 1850s Frederick as it is today; I don’t find any.)

Older Posts »

Powered by WordPress